PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMBBY vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IMBBY and VUAG.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
28.13%
9.96%
IMBBY
VUAG.L

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMBBY:

3.05

VUAG.L:

2.16

Sortino Ratio

IMBBY:

4.13

VUAG.L:

3.07

Omega Ratio

IMBBY:

1.56

VUAG.L:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

IMBBY:

1.85

VUAG.L:

2.26

Martin Ratio

IMBBY:

18.18

VUAG.L:

15.27

Ulcer Index

IMBBY:

3.06%

VUAG.L:

1.65%

Daily Std Dev

IMBBY:

18.25%

VUAG.L:

11.67%

Max Drawdown

IMBBY:

-65.18%

VUAG.L:

-25.61%

Current Drawdown

IMBBY:

-3.23%

VUAG.L:

-1.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than VUAG.L's 3.16% return.


IMBBY

YTD

9.20%

1M

10.55%

6M

28.22%

1Y

56.59%

5Y*

17.56%

10Y*

3.87%

VUAG.L

YTD

3.16%

1M

-0.43%

6M

14.07%

1Y

25.11%

5Y*

15.03%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMBBY is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMBBY is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUAG.L is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUAG.L is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUAG.L is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUAG.L is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUAG.L is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUAG.L is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.003.731.93
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 5.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.242.66
The chart of Omega ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.691.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 5.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.502.12
The chart of Martin ratio for IMBBY, currently valued at 34.58, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0034.5811.34
IMBBY
VUAG.L

The current IMBBY Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBBY and VUAG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.73
1.93
IMBBY
VUAG.L

Dividends

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while VUAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
3.64%6.04%7.61%7.03%8.61%9.98%10.46%7.98%4.86%4.77%5.37%4.45%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and VUAG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.23%
-0.02%
IMBBY
VUAG.L

Volatility

IMBBY vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 3.34%. This indicates that IMBBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.57%
3.34%
IMBBY
VUAG.L
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab