IMAY vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IMAY (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMAY is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMAY returned 11.67% vs 22.36% for QFLR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

IMAY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAY achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's 2.95% return.

IMAY

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IMAY Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May	4.39%	20.08%	0.30%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	2.95%	17.27%	15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAY and QFLR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	0.57

The correlation between IMAY and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMAY vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMAY	QFLR
Financial Services	24.7%	0.9%
Industrials	19.8%	2.8%
Healthcare	10.6%	3.2%
Technology	10.3%	50.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	9.2%
Basic Materials	5.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	4.5%	18.4%
Energy	4.0%	1.1%
Utilities	4.0%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

IMAY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAY

IMAY Risk / Return Rank: 56
IMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 62
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMAY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.89	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.50	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.95	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	12.46	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMAY vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAY and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMAY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.89	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	1.22	0.00

Drawdowns

IMAY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAY drawdown since its inception was -9.38%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAY and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMAY	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-13.97%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.22%	-7.61%	+3.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-4.16%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-2.50%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.80%	-0.78%

Volatility

IMAY vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May (IMAY) is 2.86%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that IMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMAY	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	4.48%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.93%	8.87%	-2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.36%	11.87%	-4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.51%	12.83%	-3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.51%	12.83%	-3.32%

IMAY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMAY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAY nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IMAY Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMAY and QFLR in my portfolio?

IMAY and QFLR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMAY or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to IMAY (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMAY dropped -9.38% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, IMAY or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 22.36% vs 11.67% for IMAY. On fees, IMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMAY or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 22.36% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMAY or QFLR?

IMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMAY or QFLR?

IMAY and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IMAY and QFLR?

IMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAY and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.