ILTB vs. DGRO
ILTB (iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ILTB is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD), while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILTB returned 1.32%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILTB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ILTB vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILTB achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ILTB has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 1.32%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.
ILTB
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 2.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
ILTB vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 0.30% | 7.22% | -3.00% | 8.04% | -26.62% | -2.67% | 16.10% | 19.61% | -5.10% | 11.24% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILTB and DGRO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, ILTB and DGRO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILTB vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ILTB
DGRO
ILTB vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILTB | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.50 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 13.52 | -10.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILTB | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.39 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.77 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.80 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.76 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ILTB vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILTB drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILTB and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILTB | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -35.10% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -6.47% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.60% | -14.03% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.22% | -19.31% | -15.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | -35.10% | -1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.28% | -0.28% | -21.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -3.44% | -6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.67% | +0.46% |
Volatility
ILTB vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that ILTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILTB | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.21% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.54% | 6.91% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 9.48% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 13.82% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 16.62% | -5.06% |
ILTB vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILTB vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ILTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.83% | 4.91% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILTB and DGRO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILTB has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILTB dropped -36.88% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 1.32% for ILTB. On fees, ILTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.
ILTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
ILTB is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ILTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD), while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ILTB and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILTB and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer