PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILTB vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILTB vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILTB achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ILTB has underperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 1.30%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.


ILTB

1D
0.34%
1M
2.86%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.09%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
-3.11%
10Y*
1.30%

VCLT

1D
0.19%
1M
2.49%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.51%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
-2.12%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILTB vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILTB
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
1.14%7.22%-3.00%8.04%-26.62%-2.67%16.10%19.61%-5.10%11.24%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.53%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ILTB and VCLT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009

0.84

The correlation between ILTB and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.98 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILTB vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILTB
ILTB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ILTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ILTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILTB vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILTBVCLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

3.46

-0.09

ILTB vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILTB Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILTB and VCLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILTB vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILTB drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than VCLT's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILTB and VCLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILTBVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-34.31%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-5.25%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.60%

-13.03%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.22%

-34.31%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

-34.31%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.62%

-13.90%

-6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-8.17%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.16%

+0.02%

Volatility

ILTB vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) have volatilities of 2.16% and 2.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILTBVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

2.24%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.66%

5.82%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

7.84%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

12.78%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

12.85%

-1.28%

ILTB vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILTB vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

ILTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than VCLT's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILTB
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
4.92%4.83%4.91%4.38%4.31%3.04%3.32%3.45%4.13%3.97%3.99%4.20%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.52%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ILTB and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCLT has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to ILTB (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILTB dropped -36.88% vs VCLT's -34.31%.

On 10-year performance, VCLT leads with 2.27% vs 1.30% for ILTB. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCLT has performed better with a 2.27% return vs 1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ILTB.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 4.92% for ILTB.

ILTB is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while VCLT is Corporate Bonds. ILTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD), while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ILTB and 0.03% for VCLT.

VCLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILTB and VCLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer