ILTB vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
ILTB and BLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both ILTB and BLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ILTB or BLV.
Key characteristics
| ILTB | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.05% | -1.82% |
| 1Y Return | 11.77% | 10.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.73% | -8.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.25% | -2.73% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.84% | 1.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.97 | 0.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.44 | 1.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.35 | 0.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.85 | 2.41 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.04% | 4.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.85% | 12.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.88% | -38.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.33% | -27.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILTB and BLV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ILTB vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ILTB achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's -1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ILTB has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 1.84%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILTB vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ILTB vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ILTB vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
ILTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than BLV's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.21% | 3.88% | 5.66% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.51% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 5.84% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% | 3.90% | 4.85% |
Drawdowns
ILTB vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILTB drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, roughly equal to the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILTB and BLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ILTB vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) have volatilities of 4.02% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.