ILMN vs. RGTI
ILMN (Illumina, Inc.) and RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) are both stocks. ILMN operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while RGTI operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ILMN returned -17.63%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ILMN vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILMN achieves a 33.49% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -11.83% return.
ILMN
- 1D
- 6.16%
- 1M
- 21.25%
- YTD
- 33.49%
- 6M
- 29.39%
- 1Y
- 91.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.72%
- 5Y*
- -17.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
RGTI
- 1D
- -8.22%
- 1M
- -26.08%
- YTD
- -11.83%
- 6M
- -20.32%
- 1Y
- 69.83%
- 3Y*
- 177.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ILMN vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 33.49% | -1.85% | -1.34% | -31.14% | -46.85% | -5.68% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -11.83% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILMN and RGTI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
ILMN:
$26.96B
RGTI:
$6.55B
ILMN:
$5.48
RGTI:
-$0.71
ILMN:
6.21
RGTI:
618.35
ILMN:
8.90
RGTI:
11.23
ILMN:
$4.39B
RGTI:
$10.02M
ILMN:
$2.93B
RGTI:
$3.00M
ILMN:
$1.39B
RGTI:
-$263.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILMN vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
ILMN
RGTI
ILMN vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ILMN | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.19 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 0.91 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 1.37 | +6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ILMN vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILMN drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, roughly equal to the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMN and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILMN | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.14% | -96.89% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.66% | -77.10% | +51.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.45% | -78.83% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.23% | -96.89% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.71% | -65.34% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -58.86% | +18.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 51.04% | -39.68% |
Volatility
ILMN vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) is 13.35%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 31.01%. This indicates that ILMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILMN | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 31.01% | -17.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.38% | 71.75% | -41.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.70% | 109.71% | -62.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.82% | 129.27% | -83.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 127.02% | -84.79% |
Dividends
ILMN vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison
Neither ILMN nor RGTI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ILMN vs. RGTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illumina, Inc. and Rigetti Computing Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ILMN and RGTI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (31.01%) compared to ILMN (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILMN dropped -96.14% vs RGTI's -96.89%.
ILMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILMN and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer