ILMN vs. JNJ

In the year-to-date period, ILMN achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's -4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ILMN has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of -2.69%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.22% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ILMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILMN and JNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ILMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.

The maximum ILMN drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMN and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 4.43%. This indicates that ILMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illumina, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.