PortfoliosLab logo
ILMN vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ILMN and SMH is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

ILMN vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
305.98%
863.20%
ILMN
SMH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ILMN:

-0.86

SMH:

0.06

Sortino Ratio

ILMN:

-1.18

SMH:

0.38

Omega Ratio

ILMN:

0.87

SMH:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

ILMN:

-0.42

SMH:

0.07

Martin Ratio

ILMN:

-1.60

SMH:

0.17

Ulcer Index

ILMN:

22.57%

SMH:

14.52%

Daily Std Dev

ILMN:

42.10%

SMH:

43.08%

Max Drawdown

ILMN:

-96.14%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

ILMN:

-84.85%

SMH:

-24.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILMN achieves a -42.12% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's -12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ILMN has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -8.08%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.


ILMN

YTD

-42.12%

1M

-6.62%

6M

-45.51%

1Y

-34.31%

5Y*

-23.83%

10Y*

-8.08%

SMH

YTD

-12.47%

1M

-4.52%

6M

-15.83%

1Y

0.33%

5Y*

27.24%

10Y*

23.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ILMN vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ILMN is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ILMN is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ILMN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ILMN is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ILMN is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ILMN is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ILMN vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ILMN, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
ILMN: -0.86
SMH: 0.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for ILMN, currently valued at -1.18, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
ILMN: -1.18
SMH: 0.38
The chart of Omega ratio for ILMN, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
ILMN: 0.87
SMH: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for ILMN, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
ILMN: -0.42
SMH: 0.07
The chart of Martin ratio for ILMN, currently valued at -1.60, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
ILMN: -1.60
SMH: 0.17

The current ILMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILMN and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.86
0.06
ILMN
SMH

Dividends

ILMN vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ILMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.51%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

ILMN vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILMN drawdown since its inception was -96.14%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILMN and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-84.85%
-24.30%
ILMN
SMH

Volatility

ILMN vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) is 17.00%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 23.93%. This indicates that ILMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.00%
23.93%
ILMN
SMH