ILF vs. SLANX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX).
ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. SLANX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 29, 2001.
Performance
ILF vs. SLANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILF vs. SLANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 16.65% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -6.85% | 26.33% |
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 7.80% | 54.13% | -28.52% | 33.24% | 8.08% | -9.06% | 0.70% | 35.56% | -2.82% | 32.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than SLANX's 7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ILF has underperformed SLANX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while SLANX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.
ILF
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
SLANX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 45.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILF vs. SLANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SLANX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILF vs. SLANX — Risk / Return Rank
ILF
SLANX
ILF vs. SLANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILF | SLANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 1.84 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.27 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 3.31 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.54 | 11.32 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILF | SLANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.84 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.45 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.32 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and SLANX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ILF vs. SLANX - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than SLANX's 3.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.76% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 3.85% | 4.15% | 5.13% | 3.14% | 7.15% | 14.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.21% | 1.57% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ILF vs. SLANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SLANX drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and SLANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILF | SLANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.48% | -70.73% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -12.85% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -29.92% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.79% | -50.91% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -9.63% | +4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -23.43% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 3.75% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ILF vs. SLANX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) at 10.49%. This indicates that ILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILF | SLANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 10.49% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 16.93% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 24.11% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 23.14% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 27.01% | +1.58% |