SLANX vs. MGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX).
SLANX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 29, 2001. MGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 14, 1995.
Performance
SLANX vs. MGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLANX vs. MGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 7.80% | 54.13% | -28.52% | 33.24% | 8.08% | -9.06% | 0.70% | 35.56% | -2.82% | 32.20% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | -1.25% | 14.73% | 3.56% | 9.15% | -6.87% | 6.36% | 2.26% | 12.61% | 0.33% | 13.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLANX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than MGINX's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SLANX has outperformed MGINX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while MGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.73% annualized return.
SLANX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 45.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
MGINX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLANX vs. MGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLANX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MGINX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLANX vs. MGINX — Risk / Return Rank
SLANX
MGINX
SLANX vs. MGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLANX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.35 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 1.89 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.51 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 6.88 | +4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLANX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.35 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLANX and MGINX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SLANX vs. MGINX - Dividend Comparison
SLANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than MGINX's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 3.85% | 4.15% | 5.13% | 3.14% | 7.15% | 14.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.21% | 1.57% |
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.88% | 4.76% | 1.20% | 0.81% | 3.23% | 6.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLANX vs. MGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLANX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than MGINX's maximum drawdown of -63.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLANX and MGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLANX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -63.39% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -7.01% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.92% | -12.16% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.91% | -15.12% | -35.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -6.76% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -13.83% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 1.53% | +2.22% |
Volatility
SLANX vs. MGINX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) at 2.96%. This indicates that SLANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLANX | MGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | 2.96% | +7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 5.67% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 7.89% | +16.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 6.63% | +16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 7.49% | +19.52% |