ILF vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
ILF and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both ILF and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ILF vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILF vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 17.18% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -6.85% | 26.33% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.56% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ILF has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 8.52%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.
ILF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 6M
- 28.44%
- 1Y
- 56.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILF vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILF vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
ILF
IWM
ILF vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILF | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 1.15 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 1.70 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 1.93 | +2.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | 7.08 | +9.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILF | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.15 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.15 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.34 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and IWM is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ILF vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.75% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
ILF vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILF | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.48% | -59.05% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -13.74% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -31.91% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.79% | -41.13% | -16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -7.33% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -10.83% | -13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.73% | -0.07% |
Volatility
ILF vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.36%. This indicates that ILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILF | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 7.36% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 14.48% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.56% | 23.18% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 22.54% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 22.99% | +5.59% |