ILF vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ILF is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the S&P Latin America 40 Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ILF returned 41.16% vs -39.70% for FBTC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ILF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

ILF vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -27.39% return.

ILF

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 6M: 13.56%
• 1Y: 41.16%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 8.97%

FBTC

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -19.60%
• YTD: -27.39%
• 6M: -29.64%
• 1Y: -39.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILF vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF	14.45%	52.65%	-20.80%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-27.39%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ILF and FBTC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

ILF vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILF

ILF Risk / Return Rank: 61
ILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ILF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ILF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 3
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILF vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILF	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	-0.93	+2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	-1.31	+3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.85	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	-0.78	+3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	-1.37	+10.27

ILF vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILF and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILF vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILF	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.48%	-52.07%	-15.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.94%	-52.07%	+38.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.53%	-49.42%	+40.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.92%	-16.46%	-7.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	29.61%	-25.05%

Volatility

ILF vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) is 7.45%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that ILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILF	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	11.97%	-4.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.62%	34.39%	-15.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	43.98%	-21.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.27%	50.13%	-26.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.42%	50.13%	-21.71%

ILF vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILF vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF	3.84%	4.39%	7.44%	4.61%	12.72%	8.47%	1.88%	3.09%	3.12%	1.80%	1.59%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILF and FBTC in my portfolio?

ILF and FBTC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILF or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to ILF (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILF dropped -67.48% vs FBTC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, ILF or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, ILF leads with 41.16% vs -39.70% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ILF has been the lower-risk option at 7.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILF or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, ILF has performed better with a 41.16% return vs -39.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILF or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for ILF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILF or FBTC?

ILF has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between ILF and FBTC?

ILF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for ILF and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.