ILDR vs. TINY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY).

ILDR and TINY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILDR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on May 25, 2021. TINY is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2021.

Performance

ILDR vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ILDR vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	-9.73%	29.22%	29.31%	39.34%	-34.95%	-2.77%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	15.18%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a -9.73% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 15.18% return.

ILDR

• 1D: 4.70%
• 1M: -4.31%
• YTD: -9.73%
• 6M: -8.06%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TINY

• 1D: 5.10%
• 1M: -9.41%
• YTD: 15.18%
• 6M: 20.81%
• 1Y: 62.94%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.

ILDR

First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF

TINY

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

Return for Risk

ILDR vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR

ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 59
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 52

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 88
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILDR	TINY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.78	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.43	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	3.62	-2.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	12.26	-7.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILDR vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and TINY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILDR	TINY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.78	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.33	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and TINY is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ILDR vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.16%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.25%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, roughly equal to the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and TINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILDR	TINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.61%	-43.79%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-16.75%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.83%	-12.51%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-16.68%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	4.94%	+0.34%

Volatility

ILDR vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 8.51%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILDR	TINY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.51%	14.63%	-6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.59%	24.91%	-8.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.60%	35.60%	-9.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.13%	32.07%	-5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.13%	32.07%	-5.94%