ILDR vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. ILDR is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. Over the past year, ILDR returned 47.41% vs 209.77% for STHH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

ILDR vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.

ILDR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 13.98%
• YTD: 21.58%
• 6M: 21.69%
• 1Y: 47.41%
• 3Y*: 31.44%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

STHH

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 45.30%
• YTD: 209.56%
• 6M: 210.55%
• 1Y: 209.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILDR vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	21.58%	44.49%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	209.56%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ILDR and STHH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.55

The correlation between ILDR and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ILDR vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILDR

ILDR Risk / Return Rank: 60
ILDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ILDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ILDR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ILDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ILDR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILDR vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ILDR	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	4.20	-1.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	4.20	-1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.60	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	6.23	-3.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	14.15	-5.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ILDR vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILDR and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILDR	STHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	4.20	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	4.44	-3.88

Drawdowns

ILDR vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILDR	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.61%	-33.89%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-33.89%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	0.00%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-10.46%	-4.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	14.90%	-9.62%

Volatility

ILDR vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 6.23%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILDR	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.23%	20.33%	-14.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.21%	36.77%	-20.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.11%	50.39%	-29.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.07%	49.44%	-23.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.02%	49.44%	-23.42%

ILDR vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILDR vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.16%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILDR and STHH in my portfolio?

ILDR and STHH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILDR or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to ILDR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, ILDR or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 47.41% for ILDR. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ILDR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILDR or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 47.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILDR or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILDR or STHH?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.

What is the main difference between ILDR and STHH?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.