ILDR vs. PXQ
ILDR (First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ILDR is actively managed, while PXQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILDR returned 14.40%/yr vs 21.73%/yr for PXQ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILDR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.
Performance
ILDR vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILDR achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 63.41% return.
ILDR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 31.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
ILDR vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | 21.58% | 29.22% | 29.31% | 39.34% | -34.95% | 7.29% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 18.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILDR and PXQ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ILDR and PXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILDR vs. PXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILDR
PXQ
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ILDR
PXQ
Healthcare
ILDR
PXQ
-
Industrials
ILDR
PXQ
Communication Services
ILDR
PXQ
Consumer Cyclical
ILDR
PXQ
-
Financial Services
ILDR
PXQ
Energy
ILDR
PXQ
-
Utilities
ILDR
PXQ
-
Basic Materials
ILDR
-
PXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
ILDR
-
PXQ
-
Real Estate
ILDR
-
PXQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILDR vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank
ILDR
PXQ
ILDR vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILDR | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.76 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 10.00 | -7.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 44.01 | -35.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILDR | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 4.70 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.94 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ILDR vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILDR drawdown since its inception was -44.61%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILDR and PXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILDR | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.61% | -57.18% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -9.99% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -21.40% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.61% | -34.55% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.63% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -10.74% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 2.27% | +3.01% |
Volatility
ILDR vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) is 6.23%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that ILDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILDR | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 9.19% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.21% | 17.12% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 21.28% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 23.19% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 22.97% | +3.05% |
ILDR vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILDR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILDR vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison
ILDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILDR and PXQ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXQ has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to ILDR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILDR dropped -44.61% vs PXQ's -57.18%.
On 5-year performance, PXQ leads with 21.73% vs 14.40% for ILDR. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ILDR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ILDR.
PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ILDR.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ILDR and 0.40% for PXQ.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILDR and PXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer