ILCV vs. SCHV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.90%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for SCHV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.

Performance

ILCV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ILCV has outperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 11.90%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.

ILCV

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.03%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 1Y: 29.26%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: 11.90%
• ALL TIME*: 8.73%

SCHV

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 10.52%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: 16.46%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 11.24%
• ALL TIME*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	$1.89M	$2.26M	$2.59M
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	$128.10M	$109.56M	$118.29M

ILCV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	12.42%	18.79%	17.03%	14.43%	-7.02%	26.71%	-0.84%	25.19%	-6.24%	15.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	16.12%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCV and SCHV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.95

The correlation between ILCV and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ILCV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ILCV	SCHV
Technology	22.6%	22.9%
Financial Services	18.3%	18.7%
Healthcare	12.6%	11.2%
Communication Services	9.9%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	8.1%
Industrials	6.8%	13.9%
Energy	5.5%	5.8%
Utilities	3.4%	4.3%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	3.9%

Return for Risk

ILCV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ILCV

ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 94
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 89
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILCV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ILCV	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.21	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.15	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.39	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	3.66	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.65	14.19	+3.46

ILCV vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCV and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ILCV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ILCV	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-37.08%	-21.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.55%	-6.83%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-15.26%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.58%	-19.78%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.53%	-37.08%	+1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.21%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.26%	-3.81%	-5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.76%	-0.20%

Volatility

ILCV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 2.91% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ILCV	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	3.01%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	8.94%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	11.35%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.16%	14.53%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	16.93%	-0.30%

ILCV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ILCV and SCHV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ILCV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than SCHV's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF	1.55%	1.77%	1.99%	2.27%	2.32%	2.01%	2.96%	2.70%	2.93%	2.32%	2.76%	3.01%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.79%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILCV and SCHV in my portfolio?

ILCV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ILCV or SCHV?

SCHV has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to ILCV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, ILCV or SCHV?

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.90% vs 11.24% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ILCV or SCHV?

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ILCV or SCHV?

ILCV and SCHV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ILCV or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.55% for ILCV.

What is the main difference between ILCV and SCHV?

ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.