ILCV vs. SCHV
ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ILCV returned 11.69%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
ILCV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCV achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ILCV having a 11.69% annualized return and SCHV not far behind at 11.51%.
ILCV
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
ILCV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 8.79% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.97% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCV and SCHV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ILCV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILCV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCV
SCHV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ILCV
SCHV
Financial Services
ILCV
SCHV
Healthcare
ILCV
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
ILCV
SCHV
Industrials
ILCV
SCHV
Communication Services
ILCV
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
ILCV
SCHV
Energy
ILCV
SCHV
Utilities
ILCV
SCHV
Basic Materials
ILCV
SCHV
Real Estate
ILCV
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
ILCV
SCHV
ILCV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.50 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 4.38 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.95 | 17.71 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.82 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.73 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.68 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.72 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ILCV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCV drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCV and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -37.08% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.83% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -15.26% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -19.78% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.53% | -37.08% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -3.83% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.68% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ILCV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is 2.06%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that ILCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.97% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 8.14% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 10.63% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 14.51% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.93% | -0.27% |
ILCV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ILCV and SCHV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ILCV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
ILCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to ILCV (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCV dropped -58.63% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.69% vs 11.51% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCV and SCHV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.61% for ILCV.
ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILCV and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer