ILCG vs. MEME
ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ILCG is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ILCG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
ILCG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILCG achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
ILCG
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 14.48% | -1.58% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILCG and MEME is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.60 |
ILCG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILCG
MEME
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ILCG
MEME
Communication Services
ILCG
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
ILCG
MEME
-
Industrials
ILCG
MEME
Financial Services
ILCG
MEME
Healthcare
ILCG
MEME
Consumer Defensive
ILCG
MEME
-
Real Estate
ILCG
MEME
-
Basic Materials
ILCG
MEME
Utilities
ILCG
MEME
Energy
ILCG
MEME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILCG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
ILCG
MEME
ILCG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILCG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILCG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.28 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ILCG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILCG drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than MEME's maximum drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCG and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILCG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.98% | -48.78% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -5.93% | +4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -29.90% | +21.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility
ILCG vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILCG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 74.19% | -57.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 74.19% | -52.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 74.19% | -52.66% |
ILCG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILCG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ILCG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
ILCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILCG and MEME have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ILCG and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for ILCG and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer