PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJT vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJT vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJT achieves a 24.93% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IJT has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 11.03%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.01% annualized return.


IJT

1D
1.80%
1M
-0.05%
6M
17.88%
YTD
24.93%
1Y
34.82%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
9.64%

VNQ

1D
0.12%
1M
1.07%
6M
12.41%
YTD
14.15%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
5.01%
ALL TIME*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.87M$35.40M$31.70M
$295.66M$303.76M$314.69M

IJT vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
24.93%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%19.22%20.98%-4.40%14.47%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
14.15%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IJT and VNQ is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.65

The correlation between IJT and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJT vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJT vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJTVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.89

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

6.13

+6.90

IJT vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJT and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJT vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJT drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJT and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJTVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-73.07%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-8.34%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-17.46%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-34.48%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-42.40%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.86%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-13.53%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.57%

+0.11%

Volatility

IJT vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJTVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.28%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

10.70%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

13.81%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

18.90%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.01%

20.76%

+2.25%

IJT vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJT vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

IJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than VNQ's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.69%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.51%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJT and VNQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJT has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to VNQ (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJT dropped -57.61% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

On 10-year performance, IJT leads with 11.03% vs 5.01% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJT has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.69% for IJT.

IJT is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VNQ is REIT. IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJT and 0.13% for VNQ.

IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJT and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer