IJS vs. VV
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.07%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
IJS vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 10.07%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
IJS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
IJS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 15.13% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and VV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IJS and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
VV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJS
VV
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
VV
Industrials
IJS
VV
Technology
IJS
VV
Real Estate
IJS
VV
Energy
IJS
VV
Healthcare
IJS
VV
Basic Materials
IJS
VV
Communication Services
IJS
VV
Consumer Defensive
IJS
VV
Utilities
IJS
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
VV
IJS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 2.33 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 3.18 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.03 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 13.86 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.33 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.86 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.59 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
IJS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than VV's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -54.81% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -9.21% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -18.97% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -25.66% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | -34.28% | -13.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.72% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -6.84% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.01% | +0.82% |
Volatility
IJS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that IJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 2.84% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 8.98% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 11.99% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 17.22% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 18.19% | +5.41% |
IJS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than VV's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJS and VV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJS has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 10.07% for IJS. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.
IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.98% for VV.
IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VV is Large Cap Growth Equities. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer