PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. TCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. TCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 26.87% return.


IJS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.38%
6M
12.92%
YTD
20.25%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
10.17%
ALL TIME*
9.94%

TCV

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.05%
6M
14.79%
YTD
26.87%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.19M$29.28M$50.29M
$839.64K$680.12K$340.23K

IJS vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
20.25%12.55%
TCV
Towle Value ETF
26.87%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and TCV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025

0.82

The correlation between IJS and TCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TCV
TCV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJS vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSTCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

3.27

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

10.51

+3.16

IJS vs. TCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the TCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and TCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than TCV's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and TCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSTCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-12.23%

-47.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-12.13%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.70%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-3.22%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.76%

-1.06%

Volatility

IJS vs. TCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 3.53%, while Towle Value ETF (TCV) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSTCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.79%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

13.59%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

20.43%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

21.02%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

21.02%

+2.52%

IJS vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJS vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than TCV's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.32%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
TCV
Towle Value ETF
0.57%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and TCV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCV has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to IJS (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs TCV's -12.23%.

On 1-year performance, TCV leads with 42.65% vs 39.43% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCV has performed better with a 42.65% return vs 39.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.57% for TCV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.85% for TCV.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and TCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer