PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. ISVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 8.45% return.


IJS

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.29%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.62%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.07%

ISVL

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.16%
YTD
8.45%
6M
12.58%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
15.13%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%6.34%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
8.45%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and ISVL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.68

The correlation between IJS and ISVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. ISVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
ISVL

Financial Services

19.8%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
10.4%

Industrials

11.6%
23.3%

Technology

11.3%
4.7%

Real Estate

8.7%
11.1%

Energy

7.6%
7.3%

Healthcare

7.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

7.1%
9.1%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.3%

Utilities

2.2%
1.5%

Financial Services

IJS
19.8%
ISVL
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.9%
ISVL
10.4%

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
ISVL
23.3%

Technology

IJS
11.3%
ISVL
4.7%

Real Estate

IJS
8.7%
ISVL
11.1%

Energy

IJS
7.6%
ISVL
7.3%

Healthcare

IJS
7.6%
ISVL
3.7%

Basic Materials

IJS
7.1%
ISVL
9.1%

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
ISVL
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.8%
ISVL
5.3%

Utilities

IJS
2.2%
ISVL
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJSISVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

1.98

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

2.78

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.28

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.05

8.95

+4.10

IJS vs. ISVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ISVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and ISVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJSISVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.98

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.60

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.70

-0.29

Drawdowns

IJS vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and ISVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSISVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-30.48%

-29.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-12.48%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-12.93%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-30.48%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-2.16%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-6.66%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.18%

-0.35%

Volatility

IJS vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSISVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.54%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

12.01%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

14.47%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

16.90%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

16.78%

+6.82%

IJS vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJS vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than ISVL's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.29%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.48%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and ISVL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISVL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to IJS (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs ISVL's -30.48%.

On 5-year performance, ISVL leads with 10.07% vs 5.55% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISVL.

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.29% for IJS.

IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.30% for ISVL.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and ISVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer