ISCV vs. SLYV
ISCV (iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - ISCV tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index while SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCV returned 9.09%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SLYV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. ISCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
ISCV vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCV has underperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 9.09%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
ISCV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 32.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 39.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $725.99K | $721.48K | $862.94K | |
| $16.96M | $15.72M | $22.59M |
ISCV vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 17.01% | 10.38% | 9.31% | 16.55% | -10.58% | 29.15% | 0.86% | 19.51% | -17.39% | 8.59% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 20.36% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCV and SLYV is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ISCV and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCV vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCV
SLYV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
ISCV
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
ISCV
SLYV
Industrials
ISCV
SLYV
Healthcare
ISCV
SLYV
Real Estate
ISCV
SLYV
Technology
ISCV
SLYV
Energy
ISCV
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
ISCV
SLYV
Utilities
ISCV
SLYV
Basic Materials
ISCV
SLYV
Communication Services
ISCV
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCV vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
ISCV
SLYV
ISCV vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISCV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.96 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 13.69 | -1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISCV vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -61.15% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -9.36% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.35% | -28.68% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.35% | -28.68% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.56% | -47.73% | -3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.54% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -8.89% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.71% | -0.22% |
Volatility
ISCV vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCV | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 3.53% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 11.08% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 17.69% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 21.69% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 23.89% | -0.69% |
ISCV vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISCV vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, which matches SLYV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.74% | 2.49% | 2.60% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ISCV and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYV has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ISCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.28% vs 9.09% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
ISCV and SLYV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.83%.
ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCV and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer