PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 22.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -26.71% return.


IJS

1D
1.38%
1M
3.38%
6M
13.34%
YTD
22.15%
1Y
37.48%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.17%

IBIT

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.10%
6M
-32.61%
YTD
-26.71%
1Y
-46.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
22.15%6.54%10.63%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-26.71%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and IBIT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

-0.87

+4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

-1.40

+14.80

IJS vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-53.30%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-53.30%

+44.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-48.95%

+48.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-17.71%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

33.14%

-30.34%

Volatility

IJS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.13%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

10.89%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

34.83%

-23.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

44.38%

-26.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

49.92%

-28.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.53%

49.92%

-26.39%

IJS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IJS and IBIT have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.30%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to IJS (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, IJS leads with 37.48% vs -46.35% for IBIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IJS has performed better with a 37.48% return vs -46.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS and IBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer