PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.33% return.


IJS

1D
1.61%
1M
4.31%
YTD
17.91%
6M
16.18%
1Y
39.72%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.25%

IBIC

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.45%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
17.91%6.54%7.33%11.14%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.33%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.01

The correlation between IJS and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.23

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

16.64

-12.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

59.19

-45.08

IJS vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-0.90%

-59.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-0.27%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.17%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-0.10%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

0.08%

+2.73%

Volatility

IJS vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.22%. This indicates that IJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

0.22%

+4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

0.67%

+11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

0.89%

+17.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

1.57%

+20.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

1.57%

+22.05%

IJS vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.35%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJS and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJS has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to IBIC (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IJS leads with 39.72% vs 4.32% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IJS has performed better with a 39.72% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.35% for IJS.

IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer