IJS vs. IAU
IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJS returned 10.20%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for IAU. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IJS vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 10.20%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
IJS
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 41.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
IJS vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 16.54% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 4.00% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJS and IAU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IJS and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (10 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJS vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJS
IAU
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IJS
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJS
IAU
-
Industrials
IJS
IAU
-
Technology
IJS
IAU
-
Real Estate
IJS
IAU
Energy
IJS
IAU
-
Healthcare
IJS
IAU
-
Basic Materials
IJS
IAU
-
Communication Services
IJS
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
IJS
IAU
-
Utilities
IJS
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJS vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
IJS
IAU
IJS vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJS | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 1.23 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 1.63 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 1.87 | +2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 4.69 | +9.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJS | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 1.23 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 1.05 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.63 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IJS vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJS | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -45.14% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -19.18% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.65% | -19.18% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -20.93% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.68% | -21.82% | -25.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.88% | +16.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -15.96% | +6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 7.63% | -4.80% |
Volatility
IJS vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is 4.43%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that IJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJS | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 5.78% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 23.00% | -11.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 26.51% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 17.96% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 15.90% | +7.70% |
IJS vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IJS and IAU have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJS vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJS and IAU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to IJS (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.42% vs 10.20% for IJS. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJS and IAU have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IJS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IAU is Gold. IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price.
IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJS and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer