IJS vs. BSMC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) and BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. IJS is passively managed, while BSMC is actively managed. Over the past year, IJS returned 41.12% vs 26.47% for BSMC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BSMC.

Performance

IJS vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than BSMC's 9.76% return.

IJS

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: 16.54%
• 6M: 17.68%
• 1Y: 41.12%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 5.86%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

BSMC

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 11.98%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF	16.54%	6.54%	7.33%	19.98%
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	9.76%	15.52%	10.21%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and BSMC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023	0.91

The correlation between IJS and BSMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. BSMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJS	BSMC
Financial Services	19.8%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	15.9%	6.6%
Industrials	11.6%	19.1%
Technology	11.3%	14.7%
Real Estate	8.7%	-
Energy	7.6%	7.5%
Healthcare	7.6%	21.3%
Basic Materials	7.1%	3.4%
Communication Services	4.4%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	13.0%
Utilities	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

IJS vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS

IJS Risk / Return Rank: 71
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

BSMC

BSMC Risk / Return Rank: 54
BSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IJS	BSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.83	+0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.69	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	2.86	+1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.25	10.15	+4.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IJS vs. BSMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BSMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and BSMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IJS	BSMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	1.83	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.14	-0.74

Drawdowns

IJS vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than BSMC's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and BSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJS	BSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.11%	-19.15%	-40.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-9.02%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.50%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-2.68%	-7.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.54%	+0.29%

Volatility

IJS vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) at 4.19%. This indicates that IJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJS	BSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	4.19%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.44%	10.06%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.27%	14.52%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.98%	16.10%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	16.10%	+7.50%

IJS vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJS vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BSMC's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	0.95%	1.17%	1.02%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF	1.28%	1.62%	1.78%	1.42%	1.46%	1.52%	1.00%	1.66%	1.75%	1.41%	1.22%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJS and BSMC in my portfolio?

IJS and BSMC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJS or BSMC?

IJS has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to BSMC (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs BSMC's -19.15%.

Which ETF is better, IJS or BSMC?

On 1-year performance, IJS leads with 41.12% vs 26.47% for BSMC. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BSMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJS or BSMC?

Over the 1-year period, IJS has performed better with a 41.12% return vs 26.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJS or BSMC?

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJS or BSMC?

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.95% for BSMC.

What is the main difference between IJS and BSMC?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brandes. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.70% for BSMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.