PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJR vs. SLYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJR vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJR having a 15.38% return and SLYG slightly higher at 15.50%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJR having a 10.66% annualized return and SLYG not far ahead at 10.83%.


IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%

SLYG

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.98%
YTD
15.50%
6M
13.61%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJR vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
15.50%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IJR and SLYG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000

0.92

The correlation between IJR and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJR vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJR
SLYG

Financial Services

16.8%
13.9%

Industrials

15.5%
19.5%

Technology

15.5%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.4%

Healthcare

11.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

7.6%
6.4%

Energy

5.9%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.8%

Utilities

2.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

IJR
16.8%
SLYG
13.9%

Industrials

IJR
15.5%
SLYG
19.5%

Technology

IJR
15.5%
SLYG
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IJR
13.4%
SLYG
10.4%

Healthcare

IJR
11.1%
SLYG
14.4%

Real Estate

IJR
7.6%
SLYG
6.4%

Energy

IJR
5.9%
SLYG
5.1%

Basic Materials

IJR
5.1%
SLYG
2.8%

Communication Services

IJR
3.6%
SLYG
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJR
3.5%
SLYG
2.8%

Utilities

IJR
2.0%
SLYG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJR vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJR vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJRSLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.89

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

10.11

+2.03

IJR vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJR and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJRSLYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.50

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.31

+0.13

Drawdowns

IJR vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and SLYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJRSLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-62.15%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-9.10%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.02%

-27.39%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-29.18%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-41.86%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.42%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-14.55%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.60%

0.00%

Volatility

IJR vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJRSLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.59%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

12.47%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

17.57%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

21.51%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

22.74%

+0.17%

IJR vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJR vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than SLYG's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.71%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IJR and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to IJR (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs SLYG's -62.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 10.83% vs 10.66% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.71% for SLYG.

IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.15% for SLYG.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJR and SLYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer