IJK vs. QQQJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - IJK tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index while QQQJ tracks the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJK returned 8.76%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for QQQJ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQJ.

Performance

IJK vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQJ's 21.43% return.

IJK

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 20.35%
• 6M: 17.46%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

QQQJ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 21.43%
• 6M: 18.32%
• 1Y: 44.44%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: 6.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	20.35%	7.28%	15.68%	17.41%	-19.03%	18.68%	12.65%
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	21.43%	20.44%	15.36%	13.68%	-28.25%	9.76%	15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and QQQJ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.89

The correlation between IJK and QQQJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. QQQJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJK	QQQJ
Industrials	30.2%	11.1%
Technology	24.8%	40.4%
Healthcare	13.7%	18.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	11.3%
Financial Services	6.7%	2.0%
Real Estate	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.6%
Energy	3.2%	1.0%
Utilities	2.0%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	2.6%
Communication Services	1.4%	7.8%

Return for Risk

IJK vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK

IJK Risk / Return Rank: 61
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QQQJ

QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IJK	QQQJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.36	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.12	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.77	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	15.67	-2.77

IJK vs. QQQJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QQQJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and QQQJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IJK vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than QQQJ's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and QQQJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJK	QQQJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.47%	-39.57%	-14.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-11.84%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.63%	-22.46%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-39.57%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.13%	+2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-15.63%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.84%	-0.32%

Volatility

IJK vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is 5.57%, while Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that IJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJK	QQQJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	7.13%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	15.65%	-1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	18.99%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	22.17%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	22.11%	-1.00%

IJK vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJK vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than QQQJ's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF	0.52%	0.66%	0.79%	1.13%	1.08%	0.50%	0.70%	1.09%	1.13%	0.93%	1.15%	1.12%
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	0.75%	0.85%	0.77%	0.67%	0.76%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJK and QQQJ in my portfolio?

IJK and QQQJ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IJK or QQQJ?

QQQJ has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to IJK (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs QQQJ's -39.57%.

Which ETF is better, IJK or QQQJ?

On 5-year performance, IJK leads with 8.76% vs 6.66% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IJK or QQQJ?

Over the 5-year period, IJK has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJK or QQQJ?

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IJK or QQQJ?

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.52% for IJK.

What is the main difference between IJK and QQQJ?

IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.15% for QQQJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.