IJK vs. GLRY
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire. IJK is passively managed, while GLRY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJK returned 8.64%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for GLRY. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GLRY.
Performance
IJK vs. GLRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than GLRY's 16.74% return.
IJK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
GLRY
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
IJK vs. GLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 19.41% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 3.24% |
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 16.74% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and GLRY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IJK and GLRY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJK vs. GLRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
GLRY
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IJK
GLRY
Technology
IJK
GLRY
Healthcare
IJK
GLRY
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
GLRY
Financial Services
IJK
GLRY
Real Estate
IJK
GLRY
Energy
IJK
GLRY
Basic Materials
IJK
GLRY
Consumer Defensive
IJK
GLRY
Utilities
IJK
GLRY
Communication Services
IJK
GLRY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. GLRY — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
GLRY
IJK vs. GLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJK | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.72 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 9.44 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJK | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.63 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.52 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IJK vs. GLRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than GLRY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and GLRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -40.60% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -10.89% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -20.50% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -34.63% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.80% | -16.03% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.13% | -0.62% |
Volatility
IJK vs. GLRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is 4.98%, while Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that IJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 5.58% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 15.15% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 18.18% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 20.06% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 21.40% | -0.34% |
IJK vs. GLRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GLRY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJK vs. GLRY - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than GLRY's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJK and GLRY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to IJK (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs GLRY's -40.60%.
On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.75% vs 8.64% for IJK. On fees, IJK is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IJK has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJK is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
IJK has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLRY is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.85% for GLRY.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and GLRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer