PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJK vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.54%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


IJK

1D
0.34%
1M
4.53%
YTD
19.41%
6M
18.76%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.54%

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
19.41%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and DGRO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.84

The correlation between IJK and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJK vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJK
DGRO

Industrials

31.1%
10.8%

Technology

21.8%
19.4%

Healthcare

13.5%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.7%

Financial Services

7.3%
21.2%

Real Estate

5.5%

-

Energy

3.7%
5.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
11.5%

Utilities

2.0%
6.9%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.1%

Industrials

IJK
31.1%
DGRO
10.8%

Technology

IJK
21.8%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

IJK
13.5%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJK
7.9%
DGRO
5.7%

Financial Services

IJK
7.3%
DGRO
21.2%

Real Estate

IJK
5.5%
DGRO

-

Energy

IJK
3.7%
DGRO
5.6%

Basic Materials

IJK
3.6%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IJK
2.1%
DGRO
11.5%

Utilities

IJK
2.0%
DGRO
6.9%

Communication Services

IJK
1.5%
DGRO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJKDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.71

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

14.33

-2.24

IJK vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJKDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.53

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.78

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.77

-0.40

Drawdowns

IJK vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJKDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-35.10%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-6.47%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-14.03%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-19.31%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-35.10%

-4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.80%

-3.44%

-7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.67%

+0.84%

Volatility

IJK vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJKDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

2.24%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

6.94%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

9.49%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

13.82%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

16.62%

+4.44%

IJK vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJK vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJK and DGRO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.34% vs 11.54% for IJK. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.54% for IJK.

IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer