IJJ vs. EQRR
IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IJJ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJJ returned 7.53%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for EQRR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJJ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
IJJ vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJJ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 28.12% return.
IJJ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
EQRR
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 6M
- 27.54%
- 1Y
- 44.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
IJJ vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 9.44% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 15.24% | -7.11% | 30.45% | 3.56% | 25.66% | -12.06% | 5.77% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.12% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJJ and EQRR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IJJ and EQRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJJ vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJJ
EQRR
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
IJJ
EQRR
Industrials
IJJ
EQRR
Consumer Cyclical
IJJ
EQRR
Real Estate
IJJ
EQRR
-
Technology
IJJ
EQRR
Energy
IJJ
EQRR
Basic Materials
IJJ
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
IJJ
EQRR
-
Utilities
IJJ
EQRR
-
Healthcare
IJJ
EQRR
-
Communication Services
IJJ
EQRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJJ vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
IJJ
EQRR
IJJ vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJJ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.59 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 8.94 | -6.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 33.32 | -26.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJJ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 3.30 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IJJ vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJJ drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJJ and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJJ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -57.93% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -4.95% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.68% | -17.75% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | -21.75% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -10.07% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.33% | +1.73% |
Volatility
IJJ vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is 3.70%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that IJJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJJ | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.69% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 10.36% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 13.48% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 21.39% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 24.86% | -2.83% |
IJJ vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJJ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJJ vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
IJJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJJ and EQRR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to IJJ (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJJ dropped -58.00% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.47% vs 7.53% for IJJ. On fees, IJJ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJJ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.
IJJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IJJ and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJJ and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer