PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 11.74%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.


IJH

1D
0.38%
1M
3.76%
YTD
15.82%
6M
13.38%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
11.74%

YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
15.82%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and YCS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

0.18

The correlation between IJH and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJHYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.79

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

11.86

-0.41

IJH vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-49.56%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-8.30%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-23.05%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-27.32%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-27.32%

-14.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-19.88%

+12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.65%

-0.24%

Volatility

IJH vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

2.22%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.19%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

16.96%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

21.10%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

18.96%

+2.25%

IJH vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJH vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJH and YCS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs 11.74% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer