PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 11.03%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


IJH

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.08%
6M
10.14%
YTD
14.60%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

VV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.19%
6M
8.54%
YTD
9.78%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$461.96M$459.67M$538.23M
$85.99M$75.21M$96.89M

IJH vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.60%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
9.78%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and VV is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.89

The correlation between IJH and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJH vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJH
VV

Industrials

25.2%
8.2%

Technology

17.5%
39.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.9%

Real Estate

7.2%
1.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.7%

Energy

4.6%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.4%

Utilities

2.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

1.5%
9.7%

Industrials

IJH
25.2%
VV
8.2%

Technology

IJH
17.5%
VV
39.1%

Financial Services

IJH
13.9%
VV
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.5%
VV
9.0%

Healthcare

IJH
8.9%
VV
8.9%

Real Estate

IJH
7.2%
VV
1.6%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
VV
1.7%

Energy

IJH
4.6%
VV
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.2%
VV
4.4%

Utilities

IJH
2.8%
VV
2.5%

Communication Services

IJH
1.5%
VV
9.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJH vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJHVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.07

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

8.71

-0.03

IJH vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-54.81%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-9.21%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-18.97%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-25.66%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-34.28%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.53%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-6.80%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.18%

+0.24%

Volatility

IJH vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.64%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

10.18%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

13.01%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.35%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

18.21%

+2.92%

IJH vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJH vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than VV's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJH and VV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to IJH (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.14% vs 11.03% for IJH. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.02% for VV.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer