IJH vs. SLV
IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.27%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IJH vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 11.27%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
IJH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IJH vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.10% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJH and SLV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.21 |
IJH vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJH
SLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
IJH
SLV
-
Technology
IJH
SLV
-
Financial Services
IJH
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJH
SLV
-
Healthcare
IJH
SLV
-
Real Estate
IJH
SLV
-
Energy
IJH
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IJH
SLV
Consumer Defensive
IJH
SLV
-
Utilities
IJH
SLV
-
Communication Services
IJH
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJH vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IJH
SLV
IJH vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.62 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 5.64 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.89 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.25 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
IJH vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.07% | -76.28% | +21.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -42.45% | +33.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -42.45% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -42.45% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.18% | -42.81% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -37.30% | +37.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -44.67% | +37.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 19.67% | -17.26% |
Volatility
IJH vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 4.37%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJH | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 16.30% | -11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 58.31% | -46.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 58.90% | -43.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 36.15% | -16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 31.84% | -10.66% |
IJH vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJH vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJH and SLV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IJH (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 11.27% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJH and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer