PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IJH vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IJH vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJH returned 11.56%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for IEMG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJH charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

IJH vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 11.56%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.42% annualized return.

IJH

1D
0.72%
1M
3.98%
YTD
15.48%
6M
14.03%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
11.56%

IEMG

1D
0.61%
1M
0.63%
YTD
22.84%
6M
25.59%
1Y
42.50%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		15.48%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		22.84%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and IEMG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.64

The correlation between IJH and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJH vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IJH
IEMG

Industrials

25.0%
9.0%

Technology

15.7%
35.0%

Financial Services

14.4%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
3.7%

Real Estate

7.5%
1.7%

Energy

5.5%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.3%

Utilities

3.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.0%
6.4%

Industrials

IJH
25.0%
IEMG
9.0%

Technology

IJH
15.7%
IEMG
35.0%

Financial Services

IJH
14.4%
IEMG
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.7%
IEMG
9.5%

Healthcare

IJH
8.6%
IEMG
3.7%

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
IEMG
1.7%

Energy

IJH
5.5%
IEMG
3.8%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
IEMG
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.8%
IEMG
3.3%

Utilities

IJH
3.1%
IEMG
2.2%

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
IEMG
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with IJH:
IJH vs. VOIJH vs. IJRIJH vs. MDYIJH vs. IJJIJH vs. IJKIJH vs. SCHMIJH vs. IVOO
Often compared with IEMG:
IEMG vs. VWOIEMG vs. EEMIEMG vs. IEFAIEMG vs. EMXCIEMG vs. SCHEIEMG vs. IXUSIEMG vs. SPY

Return for Risk

IJH vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IJHIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
2.03

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.39
2.65

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.23

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

11.89

-1.09

IJH vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJH vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IEMG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IJHIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-38.71%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-13.21%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-17.21%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-35.75%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-38.71%

-3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.98%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-12.95%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.59%

-1.18%

Volatility

IJH vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 5.09%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IJHIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

10.60%

-5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

18.89%

-7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

21.08%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

18.73%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

20.17%

+1.03%

IJH vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IJH vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IEMG's 2.24% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		2.24%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF		1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

IJH and IEMG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to IJH (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.56% vs 10.42% for IEMG. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer