PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 11.27%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


IJH

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.84%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.33%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
11.27%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.10%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and IAU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.08

The correlation between IJH and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJH vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJH
IAU

Industrials

25.0%

-

Technology

15.7%

-

Financial Services

14.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Real Estate

7.5%
100.0%

Energy

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Industrials

IJH
25.0%
IAU

-

Technology

IJH
15.7%
IAU

-

Financial Services

IJH
14.4%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.7%
IAU

-

Healthcare

IJH
8.6%
IAU

-

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
IAU
100.0%

Energy

IJH
5.5%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.8%
IAU

-

Utilities

IJH
3.1%
IAU

-

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJHIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.69

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

4.19

+6.42

IJH vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJHIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.23

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.03

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.84

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.62

-0.16

Drawdowns

IJH vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-45.14%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-19.18%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-19.18%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-20.93%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-21.82%

-20.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-17.70%

+17.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-15.96%

+8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

7.71%

-5.30%

Volatility

IJH vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is 4.37%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

5.50%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

23.02%

-11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

26.42%

-10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

17.95%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

15.90%

+5.28%

IJH vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJH vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJH and IAU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IJH (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 11.27% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IAU is Gold. IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.25% for IAU.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer