PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJAN vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJAN vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJAN achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 12.15% return.


IJAN

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
6M
4.13%
YTD
6.78%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.07%

EFA

1D
0.42%
1M
1.58%
6M
6.21%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19B$1.11B$1.37B
$397.51K$366.62K$481.38K

IJAN vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IJAN
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January
6.78%19.62%-0.57%13.82%-2.52%7.28%3.69%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
12.15%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IJAN and EFA is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.92

The correlation between IJAN and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJAN vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJAN
IJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJAN vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJANEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.25

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

8.51

+0.97

IJAN vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJAN and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJAN vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJAN and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJANEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-61.04%

+38.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.14%

-11.42%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-14.05%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

-29.53%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.21%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-11.86%

+8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

3.02%

-1.58%

Volatility

IJAN vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) is 1.99%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that IJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJANEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

4.53%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

13.68%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

15.78%

-8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

16.62%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

17.01%

-4.60%

IJAN vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJAN vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

IJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.17%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
IJAN
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IJAN and EFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFA has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to IJAN (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJAN dropped -22.68% vs EFA's -61.04%.

On 5-year performance, EFA leads with 9.12% vs 7.51% for IJAN. On fees, EFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, IJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFA has performed better with a 9.12% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJAN.

EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.00% for IJAN.

IJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJAN and 0.32% for EFA.

IJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJAN and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer