PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJAN vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJAN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJAN achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.


IJAN

1D
0.22%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.64%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJAN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IJAN
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January
4.67%19.62%-0.57%13.82%-2.52%7.28%3.49%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%46.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IJAN and QQQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.62

The correlation between IJAN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJAN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJAN
QQQ

Financial Services

24.7%
0.2%

Industrials

19.8%
2.8%

Healthcare

10.6%
4.2%

Technology

10.3%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
7.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
15.8%

Energy

4.0%
0.6%

Utilities

4.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

IJAN
24.7%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

IJAN
19.8%
QQQ
2.8%

Healthcare

IJAN
10.6%
QQQ
4.2%

Technology

IJAN
10.3%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IJAN
7.7%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

IJAN
6.7%
QQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

IJAN
5.9%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

IJAN
4.5%
QQQ
15.8%

Energy

IJAN
4.0%
QQQ
0.6%

Utilities

IJAN
4.0%
QQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

IJAN
1.9%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJAN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJAN
IJAN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJAN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJANQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.42

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

13.14

-4.90

IJAN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJAN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJANQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.57

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.80

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Drawdowns

IJAN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJAN and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJANQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-82.97%

+60.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.14%

-11.96%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-22.77%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

-35.12%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.74%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-32.78%

+29.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

3.11%

-1.66%

Volatility

IJAN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) is 2.12%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that IJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJANQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

4.51%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

12.10%

-5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.32%

15.94%

-8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.29%

22.37%

-12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

22.29%

-9.79%

IJAN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJAN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJAN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJAN
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJAN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to IJAN (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJAN dropped -22.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.86% vs 7.18% for IJAN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJAN.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for IJAN.

IJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IJAN and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJAN and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer