IIVAX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
IIVAX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Apr 2, 2001. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.68% | 9.49% | 8.57% | 12.02% | -8.35% | 27.49% | 3.25% | 24.62% | -11.87% | 15.16% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIVAX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IIVAX having a 9.54% annualized return and HWMIX not far behind at 9.08%.
IIVAX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIVAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IIVAX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
IIVAX
HWMIX
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIVAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.93 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 5.49 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIVAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.93 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between IIVAX and HWMIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
IIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.31%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 10.31% | 10.58% | 12.75% | 4.83% | 9.72% | 10.94% | 0.48% | 3.17% | 12.58% | 13.20% | 5.91% | 9.34% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.38%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIVAX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIVAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.38% | -69.84% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -16.87% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -25.90% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.13% | -63.21% | +19.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -3.32% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -10.89% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.15% | -0.83% |
Volatility
IIVAX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that IIVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IIVAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.30% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 12.42% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 23.86% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 22.34% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 25.62% | -5.11% |