IIVAX vs. WFPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX).
IIVAX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Apr 2, 2001. WFPAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jul 31, 2007.
Performance
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.78% | 9.49% | 8.57% | 12.02% | -8.35% | 27.49% | 3.25% | 24.62% | -11.87% | 15.16% |
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 0.73% | 5.81% | 11.58% | 9.17% | -4.95% | 28.14% | 2.93% | 39.96% | -13.42% | 10.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIVAX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than WFPAX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IIVAX has underperformed WFPAX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while WFPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
IIVAX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
WFPAX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIVAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than WFPAX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IIVAX vs. WFPAX — Risk / Return Rank
IIVAX
WFPAX
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIVAX | WFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.54 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.69 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | 2.43 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIVAX | WFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.54 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.43 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between IIVAX and WFPAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Dividend Comparison
IIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, less than WFPAX's 11.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 10.50% | 10.58% | 12.75% | 4.83% | 9.72% | 10.94% | 0.48% | 3.17% | 12.58% | 13.20% | 5.91% | 9.34% |
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 11.30% | 11.38% | 7.97% | 5.39% | 8.69% | 9.86% | 0.36% | 7.38% | 2.40% | 4.14% | 1.08% | 4.14% |
Drawdowns
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.38%, roughly equal to the maximum WFPAX drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIVAX and WFPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIVAX | WFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.38% | -56.20% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -11.57% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -22.55% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.13% | -43.81% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.84% | -9.00% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -9.00% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.29% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IIVAX vs. WFPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) is 4.05%, while Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that IIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IIVAX | WFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.89% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 10.27% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 17.38% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 17.21% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 18.88% | +1.63% |