IIVAX vs. CSMCX
IIVAX (Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and CSMCX (Congress Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - IIVAX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Transamerica, while CSMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Congress. Over the past 10 years, IIVAX returned 10.07%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for CSMCX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IIVAX charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CSMCX.
Performance
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIVAX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than CSMCX's 18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IIVAX has underperformed CSMCX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while CSMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.
IIVAX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
CSMCX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 28.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 10.59% | 9.49% | 8.57% | 12.02% | -8.35% | 27.49% | 3.25% | 24.62% | -11.87% | 15.16% |
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | 18.84% | 8.37% | 18.65% | 20.27% | -26.21% | 39.30% | 39.11% | 36.12% | 2.51% | 22.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIVAX and CSMCX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2001 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IIVAX and CSMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIVAX vs. CSMCX — Risk / Return Rank
IIVAX
CSMCX
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIVAX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.25 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 7.26 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIVAX drawdown since its inception was -57.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CSMCX drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIVAX and CSMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIVAX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.38% | -56.20% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.87% | -13.63% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.76% | -26.10% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -33.44% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.13% | -33.44% | -10.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -0.34% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -9.38% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 4.22% | -1.66% |
Volatility
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (IIVAX) is 3.68%, while Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that IIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIVAX | CSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 6.23% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 16.23% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 21.67% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 22.68% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.49% | -2.01% |
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIVAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIVAX vs. CSMCX - Dividend Comparison
IIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, more than CSMCX's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.97% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.57% | 7.05% | 16.14% | 10.04% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 27.40% |
IIVAX Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 9.57% | 10.58% | 12.75% | 4.83% | 9.72% | 10.94% | 0.48% | 3.17% | 12.58% | 13.20% | 5.91% | 9.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIVAX and CSMCX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSMCX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to IIVAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIVAX dropped -57.38% vs CSMCX's -56.20%.
IIVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIVAX and CSMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer