IIRLX vs. IRLNX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IIRLX (Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio) and IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) are both mutual funds - IIRLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Voya, while IRLNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, IIRLX returned 15.48%/yr vs 17.76%/yr for IRLNX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IIRLX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IRLNX.

Performance

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIRLX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IIRLX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 15.48%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.76% annualized return.

IIRLX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -0.87%
• 6M: 6.83%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 15.48%
• ALL TIME*: 11.91%

IRLNX

• 1D: 3.13%
• 1M: -3.43%
• 6M: 1.28%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 1Y: 8.09%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 17.76%
• ALL TIME*: 16.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio	7.81%	18.77%	26.95%	29.41%	-20.07%	27.26%	21.71%	31.18%	-3.45%	22.58%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	-0.43%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IIRLX and IRLNX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009	0.96

The correlation between IIRLX and IRLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IIRLX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IIRLX

IIRLX Risk / Return Rank: 51
IIRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IIRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IIRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IIRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
IIRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 12
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IIRLX	IRLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	0.48	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	0.81	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.09	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	0.53	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	1.51	+6.06

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIRLX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIRLX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than IRLNX's maximum drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRLX and IRLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IIRLX	IRLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.33%	-32.90%	-17.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-16.64%	+6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-23.31%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.83%	-32.90%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.60%	-32.90%	+0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-9.30%	+6.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.74%	-4.75%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	5.62%	-3.20%

Volatility

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) is 3.87%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that IIRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IIRLX	IRLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	6.77%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	14.77%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	18.43%	-3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.93%	22.34%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.54%	21.60%	-3.06%

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIRLX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

IIRLX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

IIRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than IRLNX's 20.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IIRLX Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio	4.91%	3.76%	0.96%	1.14%	5.04%	4.77%	4.71%	4.35%	1.73%	1.47%	1.77%	1.66%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	20.74%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IIRLX and IRLNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, IIRLX and IRLNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IIRLX or IRLNX?

IRLNX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to IIRLX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIRLX dropped -50.33% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IIRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.