PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIGD vs. TTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIGD vs. TTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIGD achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than TTT's 3.59% return.


IIGD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.49%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

TTT

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.59%
6M
10.09%
1Y
-6.82%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
-1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIGD vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
0.25%7.11%3.90%5.71%-7.27%-1.42%6.30%7.40%0.86%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
3.59%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%-7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IIGD and TTT is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

-0.63

The correlation between IIGD and TTT shifts across timeframes, from -0.76 (3 years) to -0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IIGD vs. TTT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IIGD
TTT

Financial Services

16.7%
62.5%

Industrials

11.6%

-

Technology

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Healthcare

5.5%

-

Energy

5.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%

-

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Financial Services

IIGD
16.7%
TTT
62.5%

Industrials

IIGD
11.6%
TTT

-

Technology

IIGD
8.7%
TTT

-

Consumer Defensive

IIGD
5.6%
TTT

-

Healthcare

IIGD
5.5%
TTT

-

Energy

IIGD
5.5%
TTT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IIGD
3.0%
TTT

-

Real Estate

IIGD
3.0%
TTT

-

Communication Services

IIGD
2.4%
TTT

-

Basic Materials

IIGD
1.8%
TTT

-

Utilities

IIGD
1.3%
TTT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIGD vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIGD
IIGD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IIGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIGD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IIGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIGD vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIGDTTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.98

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.31

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

-0.58

+9.30

IIGD vs. TTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the TTT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIGD and TTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIGDTTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

-0.23

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

-0.23

+1.00

Drawdowns

IIGD vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIGD drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, smaller than the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIGD and TTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIGDTTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-94.00%

+82.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-22.18%

+20.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

-49.69%

+47.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.43%

-49.69%

+38.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-78.28%

+77.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-70.36%

+67.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

12.13%

-11.66%

Volatility

IIGD vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF (IIGD) is 0.75%, while UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that IIGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIGDTTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

8.69%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

19.48%

-17.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

29.26%

-26.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

47.18%

-43.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

43.38%

-39.68%

IIGD vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIGD has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TTT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIGD vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison

IIGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than TTT's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IIGD
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
4.28%4.25%4.13%3.74%1.73%1.77%3.21%2.44%1.23%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
9.34%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIGD and TTT have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to IIGD (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIGD dropped -11.43% vs TTT's -94.00%.

On 5-year performance, TTT leads with 17.30% vs 1.63% for IIGD. On fees, IIGD is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IIGD has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTT has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IIGD is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 4.28% for IIGD.

IIGD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while TTT is Leveraged Bonds. IIGD tracks Invesco Investment Grade Defensive Index, while TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for IIGD and 0.95% for TTT.

IIGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIGD and TTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer