IHI vs. XHS
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index while XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.43%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XHS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHS.
Performance
IHI vs. XHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -18.54% return, which is significantly lower than XHS's 27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed XHS with an annualized return of 8.43%, while XHS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- YTD
- -18.54%
- 1Y
- -15.41%
- 3Y*
- -3.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
XHS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 46.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
IHI vs. XHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -18.54% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 27.15% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | 9.76% | 33.66% | 18.81% | 1.96% | 17.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and XHS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IHI and XHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IHI vs. XHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
XHS
Healthcare
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHI
XHS
Technology
IHI
XHS
-
Industrials
IHI
XHS
Basic Materials
IHI
-
XHS
-
Communication Services
IHI
-
XHS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
XHS
-
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
XHS
-
Energy
IHI
-
XHS
-
Financial Services
IHI
-
XHS
Real Estate
IHI
-
XHS
-
Utilities
IHI
-
XHS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. XHS — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
XHS
IHI vs. XHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.45 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.89 | -4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 13.41 | -14.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. XHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than XHS's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and XHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -39.32% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -11.99% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -17.81% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -31.34% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -39.32% | +6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.08% | -1.42% | -21.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -10.12% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 3.48% | +9.15% |
Volatility
IHI vs. XHS - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) at 5.40%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 5.40% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 12.80% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 17.91% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 21.21% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 22.40% | -2.42% |
IHI vs. XHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XHS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. XHS - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than XHS's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.20% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and XHS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to XHS (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs XHS's -39.32%.
On 10-year performance, XHS leads with 9.20% vs 8.43% for IHI. On fees, XHS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHS has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XHS has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
IHI has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.20% for XHS.
IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.35% for XHS.
XHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and XHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer