IHG vs. RTO
IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group PLC) and RTO (Rentokil Initial PLC) are both stocks. IHG operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while RTO operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, IHG returned 17.77%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for RTO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IHG vs. RTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHG achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than RTO's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IHG has outperformed RTO with an annualized return of 17.77%, while RTO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.
IHG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 23.63%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 19.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
RTO
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- -8.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
IHG vs. RTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 17.02% | 14.53% | 39.13% | 59.59% | -8.70% | 0.14% | -5.17% | 27.65% | -12.53% | 50.75% |
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | 1.47% | 19.64% | -9.78% | -5.92% | -22.27% | 14.36% | 16.84% | 42.28% | -0.22% | 64.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHG and RTO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
IHG:
$25.12B
RTO:
$14.99B
IHG:
$8.92
RTO:
$1.39
IHG:
18.31
RTO:
21.27
IHG:
0.43
RTO:
11.53
IHG:
2.51
RTO:
1.31
IHG:
$10.13B
RTO:
$11.42B
IHG:
$4.63B
RTO:
$1.54B
IHG:
$2.53B
RTO:
$2.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHG vs. RTO — Risk / Return Rank
IHG
RTO
IHG vs. RTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHG | RTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.78 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 5.00 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHG | RTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 0.91 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | -0.03 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.31 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.12 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
IHG vs. RTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHG drawdown since its inception was -77.84%, smaller than the maximum RTO drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHG and RTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHG | RTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.84% | -86.53% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -15.56% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.92% | -49.81% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -50.94% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.29% | -50.94% | -8.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.46% | +25.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -30.52% | +16.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 5.53% | -1.17% |
Volatility
IHG vs. RTO - Volatility Comparison
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) at 5.68%. This indicates that IHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHG | RTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.68% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 21.48% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 30.56% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 34.41% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.52% | 33.03% | -2.51% |
Dividends
IHG vs. RTO - Dividend Comparison
IHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than RTO's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 1.57% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.52% | 1.97% | 8.04% | 30.47% | 2.72% |
RTO Rentokil Initial PLC | 2.32% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 1.73% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.87% | 1.14% | 1.69% | 2.99% | 1.54% |
Financials
IHG vs. RTO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterContinental Hotels Group PLC and Rentokil Initial PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IHG vs. RTO - Profitability Comparison
IHG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a gross profit of 979.00M and revenue of 2.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.
RTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.
IHG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported an operating income of 575.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
RTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
IHG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
RTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IHG and RTO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHG has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to RTO (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHG dropped -77.84% vs RTO's -86.53%.
IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHG and RTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer