PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHG vs. RTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IHG vs. RTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHG achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than RTO's 3.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IHG has outperformed RTO with an annualized return of 16.75%, while RTO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


IHG

1D
-1.06%
1M
-8.55%
6M
13.35%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
35.43%
3Y*
30.86%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
16.75%
ALL TIME*
20.92%

RTO

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.72%
6M
-3.36%
YTD
3.47%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
-7.93%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
4.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHG vs. RTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
12.04%14.53%39.13%59.59%-8.70%0.14%-5.17%27.65%-12.53%50.75%
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
3.47%19.64%-9.78%-5.92%-22.27%14.36%16.84%42.28%-0.22%64.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IHG and RTO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IHG:

$23.11B

RTO:

$15.15B

EPS

IHG:

$9.04

RTO:

£1.39

PE Ratio

IHG:

17.30

RTO:

16.15

PEG Ratio

IHG:

0.41

RTO:

8.75

PS Ratio

IHG:

2.37

RTO:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

IHG:

$10.13B

RTO:

£11.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IHG:

$4.63B

RTO:

£1.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

IHG:

$2.53B

RTO:

£2.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHG vs. RTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHG
IHG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RTO
RTO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHG vs. RTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHGRTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.65

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

4.07

+3.90

IHG vs. RTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the RTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHG and RTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHG vs. RTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHG drawdown since its inception was -77.84%, smaller than the maximum RTO drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHG and RTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHGRTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.84%

-86.53%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-17.87%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.92%

-49.81%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-50.94%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-50.94%

-8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.18%

-23.99%

+13.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.81%

-30.49%

+16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

7.22%

-2.77%

Volatility

IHG vs. RTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is 5.34%, while Rentokil Initial PLC (RTO) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that IHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHGRTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.82%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

21.61%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.62%

30.53%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

34.48%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.25%

32.82%

-2.57%

Dividends

IHG vs. RTO - Dividend Comparison

IHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than RTO's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
1.18%1.23%1.26%1.57%2.22%0.00%0.00%5.52%1.97%8.04%30.47%2.72%
RTO
Rentokil Initial PLC
2.28%2.23%2.28%1.73%1.38%1.30%0.00%0.87%1.14%1.69%2.99%1.54%

Financials

IHG vs. RTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterContinental Hotels Group PLC and Rentokil Initial PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.67B
2.62B
(IHG) Total Revenue
(RTO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IHG values in USD, RTO values in GBP

IHG vs. RTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InterContinental Hotels Group PLC and Rentokil Initial PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
36.7%
13.9%
Portfolio components
IHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a gross profit of 979.00M and revenue of 2.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

RTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a gross profit of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.

IHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported an operating income of 575.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

RTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported an operating income of 363.77M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

IHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

RTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rentokil Initial PLC reported a net income of 208.50M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IHG and RTO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTO has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to IHG (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHG dropped -77.84% vs RTO's -86.53%.

IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHG and RTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer