IHF vs. JAGLX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX).
IHF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. JAGLX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
IHF vs. JAGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IHF vs. JAGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | -11.80% | 0.92% | -7.90% | -1.11% | -7.11% | 24.46% | 17.67% | 22.34% | 9.56% | 25.45% |
JAGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T | -3.75% | 24.72% | 8.50% | 7.41% | -2.79% | 6.66% | 25.52% | 29.12% | 4.05% | 22.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHF achieves a -11.80% return, which is significantly lower than JAGLX's -3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IHF has underperformed JAGLX with an annualized return of 6.59%, while JAGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
IHF
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- -19.13%
- 3Y*
- -4.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
JAGLX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IHF vs. JAGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than JAGLX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. JAGLX — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
JAGLX
IHF vs. JAGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHF | JAGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 1.06 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | 1.53 | -2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.78 | -2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 4.92 | -6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHF | JAGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 1.06 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.53 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.66 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between IHF and JAGLX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IHF vs. JAGLX - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than JAGLX's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 1.26% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
JAGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T | 4.70% | 4.53% | 10.98% | 4.22% | 0.14% | 9.78% | 7.75% | 6.17% | 13.38% | 0.89% | 1.13% | 9.09% |
Drawdowns
IHF vs. JAGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, roughly equal to the maximum JAGLX drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and JAGLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | JAGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -58.96% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | -9.71% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | -22.25% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | -27.38% | -7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.81% | -6.64% | -20.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -17.51% | +6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.78% | 3.63% | +10.15% |
Volatility
IHF vs. JAGLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) is 5.01%, while Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that IHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | JAGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 5.99% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 10.63% | +5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.20% | 17.86% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 15.76% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 17.45% | +3.49% |