IHF vs. GERM
IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index while GERM tracks the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IHF returned 10.08% vs 0.00% for GERM. IHF charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
IHF vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IHF
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 1.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHF vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 7.93% | 0.92% | -15.84% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHF vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHF
GERM
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHF
GERM
Financial Services
IHF
GERM
Technology
IHF
GERM
-
Basic Materials
IHF
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
IHF
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHF
-
GERM
-
Consumer Defensive
IHF
-
GERM
-
Energy
IHF
-
GERM
-
Industrials
IHF
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
IHF
-
GERM
-
Utilities
IHF
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHF vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
IHF
GERM
IHF vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHF | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHF | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IHF vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHF drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHF and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHF | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | 0.00% | -58.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | 0.00% | -19.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | 0.00% | -10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | 0.00% | -10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 0.00% | +8.51% |
Volatility
IHF vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that IHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHF | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 0.00% | +5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 0.00% | +16.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.73% | 0.00% | +21.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 0.00% | +19.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 0.00% | +21.02% |
IHF vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHF has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHF vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHF has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHF dropped -58.42% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, IHF leads with 10.08% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, IHF is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IHF has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHF is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHF and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for IHF and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer