IHDG vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IHDG (WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IHDG tracks the WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHDG returned 10.09%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IHDG charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

IHDG vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHDG achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IHDG has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 10.09%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.

IHDG

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

DBAW

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHDG vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IHDG WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund	5.33%	14.17%	5.97%	20.00%	-11.53%	19.75%	10.51%	33.42%	-12.03%	21.93%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.12%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IHDG and DBAW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014	0.87

The correlation between IHDG and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IHDG vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IHDG	DBAW
Industrials	19.7%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	7.9%
Financial Services	15.2%	24.1%
Healthcare	9.4%	7.2%
Technology	7.8%	18.7%
Basic Materials	5.4%	6.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	5.3%
Energy	3.7%	5.3%
Utilities	0.8%	3.2%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.5%

Return for Risk

IHDG vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHDG

IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 31
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHDG vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IHDG	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.86	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	3.90	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.55	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	4.09	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.49	16.97	-11.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IHDG vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHDG and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IHDG	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.86	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.83	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.75	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.63	-0.03

Drawdowns

IHDG vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHDG drawdown since its inception was -29.24%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHDG and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IHDG	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.24%	-31.44%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.49%	-9.00%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.88%	-14.11%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.52%	-17.87%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.24%	-31.44%	+2.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.51%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-5.00%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.16%	+0.68%

Volatility

IHDG vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IHDG	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.71%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	11.00%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.55%	12.88%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	13.74%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	15.28%	+0.48%

IHDG vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

IHDG vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

IHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.29%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
IHDG WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund	1.82%	1.84%	2.42%	1.70%	13.79%	2.77%	1.94%	1.99%	0.22%	1.28%	1.91%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IHDG and DBAW in my portfolio?

IHDG and DBAW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IHDG or DBAW?

DBAW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to IHDG (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHDG dropped -29.24% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, IHDG or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs 10.09% for IHDG. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IHDG or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IHDG or DBAW?

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IHDG or DBAW?

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.82% for IHDG.

What is the main difference between IHDG and DBAW?

IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IHDG and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.