PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHD vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHD vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund (IHD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHD achieves a 28.03% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.61% return.


IHD

1D
0.65%
1M
8.16%
YTD
28.03%
6M
31.03%
1Y
52.75%
3Y*
29.43%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.10%

EFAS

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
13.61%
6M
18.42%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHD vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHD
Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund
28.03%41.70%7.80%13.95%-17.18%7.39%1.73%20.55%-10.23%29.84%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
13.61%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-11.60%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IHD and EFAS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.47

The correlation between IHD and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHD vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHD
IHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHD vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund (IHD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHDEFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

2.70

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

3.79

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.47

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

5.72

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.87

15.34

+2.52

IHD vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHD Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHD and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHDEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.70

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.56

-0.34

Drawdowns

IHD vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHD drawdown since its inception was -48.76%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHD and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHDEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.76%

-44.38%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-5.30%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-11.84%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.13%

-28.81%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.45%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.96%

-7.08%

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.98%

+1.03%

Volatility

IHD vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund (IHD) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.08%. This indicates that IHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHDEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

3.08%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

8.17%

+6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

10.67%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.59%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.33%

+1.17%

IHD vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHD has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHD vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

IHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.26%, more than EFAS's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.59%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%0.00%
IHD
Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund
9.26%11.40%13.67%10.21%13.95%10.14%9.92%9.14%10.15%8.31%11.74%14.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHD and EFAS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHD has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHD dropped -48.76% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

IHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHD and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer