PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IHAK vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IHAK vs. GINN

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IHAK tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHAK returned 8.01%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for GINN. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IHAK charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

IHAK vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHAK achieves a 33.99% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 11.71% return.

IHAK

1D
3.30%
1M
3.87%
6M
44.15%
YTD
33.99%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
14.33%

GINN

1D
2.18%
1M
3.26%
6M
11.56%
YTD
11.71%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

GINN

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
$178.04K$141.33K$214.50K

IHAK

iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
$10.37M$11.10M$9.60M

IHAK vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF		33.99%-1.29%7.60%37.77%-25.81%11.13%20.36%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF		11.71%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IHAK and GINN is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.78

The correlation between IHAK and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IHAK vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IHAK
GINN

Technology

97.1%
33.0%

Industrials

2.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

0.4%
9.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

1.3%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Healthcare

-

22.0%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Technology

IHAK
97.1%
GINN
33.0%

Industrials

IHAK
2.9%
GINN
5.0%

Communication Services

IHAK
0.4%
GINN
9.6%

Basic Materials

IHAK

-

GINN
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IHAK

-

GINN
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

IHAK

-

GINN
1.7%

Energy

IHAK

-

GINN
1.3%

Financial Services

IHAK

-

GINN
12.5%

Healthcare

IHAK

-

GINN
22.0%

Real Estate

IHAK

-

GINN
0.6%

Utilities

IHAK

-

GINN
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

Often compared with IHAK:
IHAK vs. CIBRIHAK vs. BUGIHAK vs. WCBRIHAK vs. LOCK.LIHAK vs. HACKIHAK vs. SPYIHAK vs. TECB
Often compared with GINN:
GINN vs. KOMPGINN vs. XTGINN vs. VGTGINN vs. VOOGINN vs. ARKKGINN vs. QQQGINN vs. VUG

Return for Risk

IHAK vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
IHAK
IHAK Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IHAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHAK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IHAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHAK Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHAK vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IHAKGINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
1.30

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.47
1.85

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.65

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

5.59

-2.86

IHAK vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHAK Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHAK and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHAK vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHAK drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHAK and GINN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IHAKGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-41.25%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-13.18%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.48%

-22.25%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.42%

-41.25%

+6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-13.07%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

3.87%

+5.61%

Volatility

IHAK vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 4.52%. This indicates that IHAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IHAKGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

4.52%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

13.17%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.31%

16.73%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

21.47%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

20.96%

+3.61%

IHAK vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHAK has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IHAK vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

IHAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than GINN's 1.13% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF		1.13%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF		0.07%0.08%0.20%0.13%0.25%0.50%0.40%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

IHAK and GINN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHAK has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to GINN (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHAK dropped -34.42% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, IHAK leads with 8.01% vs 6.49% for GINN. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IHAK has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.07% for IHAK.

IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IHAK and 0.50% for GINN.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHAK and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer